Although not, just has just provides scientists began to scrutinize the methods accustomed try the latest theory. During the a critique of one’s books, Rosenfeld (2005) prominent between “simple” and “complex” solutions to investigations this new replace theory. As he observed, early knowledge counting on mix-tabulations to assess whether interracial marriages tended to become formed by whites having lowest knowledge marrying extremely knowledgeable blacks essentially refuted the newest change hypothesis (Bernard 1966; Heer 1974; Monahan 1976). By comparison, previous education using “complex” log-linear habits features commonly offered new theory (Schoen and you will Wooldredge 1989; Kalmijn 1993; Qian 1997; Fu 2001; Gullickson 2006; Gullickson and you can Torche 2014; Torche and you can Rich 2016). Rosenfeld’s own preference was to play with easy procedures since the performance off cutting-edge habits count on model presumptions, while “[s]imple tabular analyses at least feel the advantageous asset of transparency” (). Yet not, he didn’t establish as to why “simple” and you will “complex” ways commonly end in contrary conclusions.

Since the battle–training change theory is in depth more 70 years ago from the Merton (1941) and you can Davis (1941), many reports enjoys tried to ensure otherwise deny it

Within responses to Rosenfeld (2005), Gullickson and you may Fu (2010) and you can Kalmijn (2010) argue into “complex” log-linear modeling strategy however,, such as for instance Rosenfeld, don’t methodically speak about why new “simple” therefore the “complex” steps produce some other abilities. (more…)